Revisions to Past Data Paint Better Picture
The headline figure on U.S. net jobs creation in October, as recorded in the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)’s Employment Situation report, was a rather tepid +128,000. But as has occurred on several other recent occasions, there were significant revisions to past data that brighten the picture considerably.
A month ago, September’s total employment count was reported as 151.722 million. Now, September is being estimated at 151.817 million, or +95,000. Therefore, October’s jobs number of 151.945 million is +223,000 when compared with what was originally reported for the prior period.
Nevertheless, there has been a deceleration in U.S. jobs growth this year. The monthly average increase in employment through the first three quarters of 2018 was +226,000. From January through September of 2019, the month average gain has been +167,000, a reduction of one-quarter (-26.0%).
Jobs, Consumer Spending and GDP
A slowing of jobs growth has become inevitable given how low the unemployment rate has become. The jobless rate is 3.6% on a seasonally adjusted (SA) basis, and it’s even tighter not seasonally adjusted (NSA), at 3.3%. Both figures are near their record all-time bottoms.
The only way to secure further large increases in employment would be for the ‘participation rate’ (working-age adults actively wanting positions) to climb dramatically. In October, the participation rate did rise, but only marginally, from 63.2% to 63.3%.
By the way, the +95,000 revision to September’s jobs count originated in ‘retail’ work (+23,000) ‒ a surprise, given all the closures of ‘bricks and mortar’ locations ‒ and even more impressively in ‘leisure and hospitality’ work (+63,000). The ‘leisure and hospitality’ jobs jump was almost all at ‘food services and drinking places’. Clearly, the population at large is still on board for expenditures on entertainment.
U.S. ‘real’ (i.e., after inflation) GDP growth has eased in the latest two quarters to +2.0% (Q2) and +1.9% (Q3). Whatever forward momentum is being maintained is being provided by consumer spending. Consumer spending, in turn, is helped along mightily by jobs growth, which will be hard pressed to stay as dominant a force as it has been.
Job Creation Winners and Losers Among Industrial Sectors
A comparison of monthly average jobs creation this year versus last year highlights strength in the following industrial sectors: ‘education and health’ (+54,000, up from +44,000); ‘leisure and hospitality’ (+29,000, up from +25,000); and ‘government’ (+15,000, up from +10,000).
Exhibiting weakness have been: ‘professional and business services’ (+33,000, down from +49,000); ‘construction’ (+13,000, down from +29,000); ‘transportation and warehousing’ (+6,000, down from +19,000); and ‘manufacturing’ (zero, down from +22,000).
Manufacturing’s record of no jobs creation so far in 2019 aligns with other indicators pointing to contraction in the sector. The Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) has dropped below 50% and the capacity utilization of production plants continues to languish below 80%.
In ‘financial services’, monthly average jobs growth this year (+10,000) has been similar to last year (+11,000), while for ‘retail’ and ‘information services’, there has been minimal change in staffing over the past two years.
Graph 1: Y/Y Jobs Growth, U.S. Total Industry & Major Subsectors −
October 2019 (based on seasonally adjusted payroll data)
Feistier Labor Relations and Earnings Impacts
The month-long General Motors strike, with ripple effects throughout the economy (i.e., through supply chains), played some role in keeping the net new jobs count muted in September.
The auto sector work stoppages, along with wildfires in California, also contributed to an elevation in the initial jobless claims number for the week of October 26th, lifting it to 228,000.
Teachers in Chicago have been on the picket lines for a week now. At least so far, however, feistier labor relations have not been leading to more rapid earnings increases. In the latest month, pay hikes for all workers in the U.S. were +3.0% y/y hourly and +2.7% weekly, not much different from where they’ve been for an extended period of time.
Construction workers, as a subset of ‘all jobs’, had compensation gains that were less hourly but more weekly, +2.4% and +3.7% respectively.
Graph 2: Average Weekly Earnings Y/Y – ‘All Jobs’ and Construction
The Federal Reserve and Interest Rates
The Federal Reserve, for the third time this year, just lowered its trend-setting interest rate. The level of the federal funds rate is now in a range between 1.50% and 1.75%.
There are only two official reasons for the Fed to alter its interest rate policy: (1) to deal with inflation (not an issue at this time); and (2) to help with jobs creation (not much more can be done).
But there are also a couple of other ‘unofficial’ reasons: (3) to change the value of the U.S. dollar (manufacturers would welcome a decline as an aid to export sales); and (4) to avoid the wrath of President Trump (who will always seek stimulus and who is also looking for a ‘break’ on government debt carrying costs).
As for (3), the U.S. economy is still performing best among all global economies and the greenback is the ‘safe-haven’ currency of choice for international investors. No marked decline in its value seems likely.
Graph 3: U.S. Manufacturing vs Construction Employment
Seasonally Adjusted (SA) Payroll Data
Alex Carrick is Chief Economist for ConstructConnect. He has delivered presentations throughout North America on the U.S., Canadian and world construction outlooks. Mr. Carrick has been with the company since 1985. Links to his numerous articles are featured on Twitter @ConstructConnx, which has 50,000 followers.