A new nationwide poll commissioned by Merit Canada and the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA) shows strong support for open bidding on government infrastructure projects.
When asked if governments should give all construction companies a “fair chance to bid on this taxpayer-funded work, not just those with unionized employees,” 83 per cent of B.C. respondents agreed. Nationally, 88 per cent agreed.
Chris Gardner, ICBA president, explained the sentiment by Canadians runs completely counter to the B.C. government’s Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) policy being used to build large infrastructure projects like the Pattullo Bridge.
“The policy is wrong,” said Gardner. “It is unfair and discriminates against 85 per cent of the men and women in construction by denying them an equal opportunity to work on government-funded projects.”
The poll comes on the heels of a different poll by the BC Building Trades that showed strong support from British Columbians for CBAs as a way to help the economy recover from COVID-19 and provide opportunities to marginalized groups.
“Hard to imagine anyone disagreeing with these policies,” said Gardner. “However, what the building trades left out is that the current NDP CBA model restricts work on government-funded projects only to those workers who are members of a building trades union.”
Gardner said only 15 per cent of the 250,000 construction workers in the province are part of a Building Trades union.
The poll confirms that Canadians in overwhelming numbers simply want what’s right,
— Paul de Jong
Progressive Contractors Association of Canada
He added the ICBA’s industry surveys show the number one issue facing construction contractors over the past four years has been the shortage of workers in construction.
“As a result, contractors have been increasing wages and benefits, investing more in training their workforce, hiring locally and recruiting as many young workers, women and people from Indigenous communities as they can find,” he said. “Further, construction contractors are entering into partnership agreements with Indigenous communities and working more closely with high schools and vocational colleges to encourage young people to pursue a career in the trades.”
Gardner also criticized the first wave of CBA projects, which he said have been characterized by fewer bidders, reduced scopes of work and higher costs.
“As a result, the stated goals of the government are simply not being met,” he said. “For good reason, you cannot expect to train more construction workers, hiring locally and recruit more young workers, women and people from Indigenous communities by freezing out 85 per cent of construction workers. “The CBA framework that the NDP government has put in place adds more complication and complexity to construction projects – the government has spent millions of taxpayer dollars to set up a new Crown corporation to administer a program that is not working. It does not make any sense and is a complete waste of taxpayer dollars.”
Andrew Mercier, B.C. Building Trades executive director, disagreed and urged British Columbians to read the CBA framework for themselves to see where they stand.
“The ICBA’s spin does not line up with the facts,” said Mercier. “Any construction company can bid on public infrastructure projects under Community Benefits Agreements irrespective of whether their workforce is organized.”
Mercier pointed to article 1.1 of the agreement which states that one of the objectives is “[t]o allow any contractor in the construction industry to bid on and perform work”.
Mercier said the impact of CBAs is to take wages out of competition and ensure the value of these projects is recaptured by the local labour market through increased training and hiring opportunities.
“I encourage anyone interested in bidding on projects under Community Benefits Agreements to look past the rhetoric and do the research themselves,” he said.
The province’s CBA policy will face its next challenge on July 16 and 17, when the ICBA, all the major construction associations in B.C. and several progressive unions will ask the B.C. Court of Appeal to strike the policy down.
“The poll confirms that Canadians in overwhelming numbers simply want what’s right: a bidding process for public projects that’s fair and open,” said Paul de Jong, president of the Progressive Contractors Association of Canada (PCA), one of the groups that will join with the ICBA in the court case. “For the Building Trades Unions to suggest that taxpayers somehow support red tape, out of control construction costs, stifled competition and shutting qualified workers out of projects, is just plain ludicrous.”
Follow the author on Twitter @RussellReports.
This CBA thing is seen by us here in BC as a backhanded method Horgan is using for rewarding and protecting his Union donors. Like Trudeau, Horgan seems to have no concept of the value of a dollar nor the meaning of ethics. Unfortunately, here in BC, there is no political party worthy of my vote.
Anyone can bid on these projects and they will also be able to bring their core people to work with us no one will be turned away. (IBEW 993)
The question posed by this poll is quite misleading, so it is not a surprise they got the answers they did. I fail to see, however, how it shows a lack of support for BC’s CBA’s. Under the B.C. Government’s CBA’s , all contractors are allowed to bid… There are no restrictions (as the question seems to insinuate) on companies without “Unionized Employees”. I am unsure where the ICBA and Merit Shop are getting their information, but if they are advising their member contractors that they are unable to bid on this work, then they should check the tender docs and CBA details, as it simply is not true. If you are a company owner who is a member of ICBA or Merit Shop, I would second guess your membership, as they are clearly misinformed as to what you are allowed or not allowed to bid on. Makes you wonder….
Any qualified company can bid on these projects but their employees will have to be paid union rates. This does not add significant cost since the large nonunion contractors pay competitive rates. Where the CBA does go wrong is that it discriminates against existing union members that live in removed areas where none of these projects are happening in favor of locals with no experience. However these new employees will have to pay initiation fees to the union.