Skip to Content
View site list

Profile

Pre-Bid Projects

Pre-Bid Projects

Click here to see Canada’s most comprehensive listing of projects in conceptual and planning stages

Government

Ontario relents on emergency holdback provisions

Don Wall
Ontario relents on emergency holdback provisions

Ontario construction firms are breathing a sigh of relief after the provincial government rescinded emergency pandemic provisions that restricted the release of holdback payments to contractors and subs.  

The government announced the change April 9 in response to concerted advocacy efforts by the Ontario General Contractors Association (OGCA), the Construction and Design Alliance of Ontario and others 

“Money can now flow to contractors,” said OGCA president Clive Thurston.  

“Together we were able to get the message across that this was an industry-wide issue that was very damaging. (Labour Minister) Monte McNaughton told us, ‘give me some language,’ we got the language written and gave it to him the next day and he went up to the attorney general.” 

An advisory statement from McMillan LLP explained that as of April 16, all procedural time periods and limitation periods under the Construction Act will be restored. The restoration of lien expiry periods means payors can again safely release holdback.  

The memo released by the office of Attorney General Don Downey said the revision will help “resolve a potentially significant cash flow problem as a result of the order for the construction industry.”

O. Reg. 73/20, which suspended all statutory limitation and procedural time periods, took effect March 16.

The provincial decision essentially reintroduces all time periods and limitations contained in the Construction Act, explained lawyer Jason J. Annibale, national co-chair, construction with McMillan. The government had moved on Reg. 73/20 with very good intentions, he said, as a means of providing relief to payors as the pandemic intensified, but it became immediately clear there were too many negative consequences for contractors.  

Under the emergency order, construction liens arguably did not expire, he explained. 

“I think it was an unintended consequence to capture the holdback within that initial order,” said Annibale. 

Owners and payors also found themselves in uncomfortable positions under 73/20, the lawyer explained.  

“We have been advising clients on this very issue and drafting notices on behalf of owner clients explaining to their contractors and subs, we wish we could pay you without incurring jeopardy,” remarked Annibale. 

“Owners and payors in the pyramid can only release remaining holdback funds when the time to asserts liens has expired,” he added, offering an example of the jeopardy issue. “If payers or owners proceed to release those funds before the expiry of lien periods, that holdback amount, they are liable to pay twice.” 

Parties involved in construction lien actions or adjudications must now make sure they are meeting procedural deadlines outlined in the Construction Act, the McMillan report explained, including the two-year deadline to set an action down for trial, and all deadlines in the prompt payment and adjudication regime. On the second point, it was unclear whether the emergency order applied. 

Problems still remain in the lien system created by the disruption of the virus, Annibale said. For example, vacating a lien requires a motion, and right now the court is generally only hearing urgent motions where “immediate and significant financial repercussions may result” or that are otherwise deemed necessary and appropriate to be heard.  

Parties will have to convince a judge that their vacating motion should be heard, he said.

Recent Comments

comments for this post are closed

You might also like