There are two very critical lessons for everyone to know when involved with public procurement.
Learning how to conform to the requirements and restrictions imposed on the procurement process under the law of tender and learning how to observe for bid-rigging and what steps to take once a suspected case is identified.
In terms of more specific advice, a buyer must do at least the following to mitigate the risks arising under the law of tender.
Buyers need to acquire at least a working knowledge of the law of tender. They need to be familiar with the different methods of public procurement, the circumstances in which each may be used, the types of product and service for which each is suited and the requirements that must be satisfied to avoid a risk of legal proceedings.
I would also suggest buyers need to be familiar with the kinds of misstep that can lead to liability under the law of tender. Client department staff are unlikely to possess such familiarity. Very often, municipal procurement efforts have led to expensive litigation because key decision-makers are simply unaware of what the law requires.
Buyers also need to understand the relationship between the rules imposed under municipal purchasing bylaws and policies, and the restrictions that exist on the award of municipal contracts under the tender process.
I have always said you should never bypass the rules to move the process along faster. Most municipalities have policies in place to handle rush purchasing issues and keep within the rules set out under the governing procurement policy.
It is always a good idea to seek advice from your manager. Even experts are unwise to guess. It is better to take the time to find out the correct answer.
It is important to note that when scoring an RFP with other people on the project, make sure everyone is using the same set of scoring criteria to apply to the process for every proponent. If the information on which evaluators are relying was not provided in the bid documents, it should not be counted.
Make sure all the bidders have provided the required information. Take the time to read their bids to confirm they have the ability to perform the contract properly.
In relation to bid-rigging, the novice buyer’s responsibility is more to keep his or her eyes open and to report any suspicious transactions to his or her manager or director, rather to play the role of detective or accuser.
There are serious risks of liability in making unfounded accusations of fraud or never-fraudulent activity (which is essentially what bid-rigging amounts to) and for this reason no concern should be taken public unless and until the matter has been properly investigated. General advice in this area includes the following:
- Avoid the risk of becoming an unwitting dope for a bid-rigging scheme. Watch for specifications that are slanted in favour of one product or contractor. When the client’s draft specifications are written too tightly, and leave out equivalent type products, it is best to go back to the department to get an explanation as to why this product is the only one that can be used.
- In some cases, there could be a very good reason for the use of this specific item. If a satisfactory explanation is not provided, discuss the issue with the purchasing manager.
- Ensure the prequalification documents are fair to all applicants bidding. Prequalification is not intended to exclude qualified bidders. The goal is to attract a reasonable number of qualified bids for every RFP issued.
For bidders on municipal contracts the most important advice I could give related to the law of tender is to take the time to submit compliant bids within the time allowed for doing so.
Stephen Bauld is a government procurement expert and can be reached at swbauld@purchasingci.com. Some of his columns may contain excerpts from The Municipal Procurement Handbook published by Butterworths.
Recent Comments